Lasse Rodeck
Forecast · origin 2025 · 0.5° grid · 49,146 inhabited cells · UCDP 1989–2026

Where organised violence settles

How likely organised violence is in each half-degree cell of the world in 2026, 2026–2030 and 2026–2035, how sustained it would be, and whether resources, shipping routes, great-power rivalry and foreign capital explain where it happens.

Record

Grid cells with violence per year · UCDP GED

Organised violence covers twice as much of the map as in 2010

The footprint of organised violence held steady through the 2000s and widened from 2012 with the wars in Syria, Iraq and Yemen, then with the Sahel insurgencies, Mexico’s cartel wars, Ethiopia, Ukraine and Sudan. In 2024 and 2025 about 2,000 cells saw at least one event, twice as many as in 2010.

Any typeState-basedNon-stateOne-sided, against civilians
A cell counts when it has at least one UCDP event in the year; events geocoded to at least the second administrative level. A cell can count under several types.

Forecast

Probability and severity

How likely violence is, and how sustained it would be

Severity is measured without counting the dead: the share of months in the window with organised violence. The model gives every cell a probability for each of four levels: none, sporadic (under 10% of months), recurrent (10–50%) and sustained (more than half). Switch between the chance of any violence and the chance of sustained violence; hover a cell for all its numbers.

Hover or tap a cell.
Boosted trees (LightGBM) over the four levels, one model per horizon, trained on origins 1994 onward. Cells under 5% are not drawn.
People facing sustained violence 2026–2035

People facing sustained violence is each cell’s population times its probability of sustained violence, summed by country. It weighs where violence is likely to stay against how many people live there.

Afghanistan and Syria lead because violence there has been sustained for years in populated valleys and cities. Pakistan, Ukraine, India, Somalia and Mexico follow. Sudan ranks lower: its current war is intense but recent, and sustained here means more than half of all months in the decade.

Spread

Cells without violence 2016–2025

Where violence could arrive next

Of cells that saw no violence for a decade, 4.5% had some in the following ten years in the back-tests. The model ranks those cells about four times better than chance. For 2026–2035 it flags – quiet cells at 20% or more, mostly on the edges of today’s wars and in densely populated places.

Quiet cells with a 20%+ risk, by country

India tops the list: large, densely populated quiet areas lie next to its insurgencies in the centre-east, the northeast and Kashmir. Congo, Iran, Sudan, Ethiopia and Chad follow, where violence of recent years borders provinces that have been quiet.

Use the “Quiet for 10 years” switch on the map to see these cells.

Horizons

Back-tests from 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, 2020

Ten years ahead the forecast still beats persistence

For each test year the models were trained only on windows that had already closed, then scored on what followed. The benchmark assumes each cell stays at the level it had over the previous years. Precision is the area under the precision-recall curve; a random ranking scores the base rate.

Any violence · all cells
Sustained violence · all cells
Any violence · quiet for 10 years
Sustained violence over a whole decade is rare: 0.25% of cells reached it in the back-tests, so its precision of 0.17–0.18 is about seventy times the base rate. The theory layers help most for quiet cells (0.21 against 0.19 for history alone); on all cells, history alone is as good or slightly better.

Drivers

Tree model · share of gain

The further ahead, the more structure matters

Which inputs the boosted-tree model uses to place a cell on the four levels. One year ahead, recent violence is almost everything. Ten years ahead, population, terrain and material value carry more than a third of the signal.

1 year5 years10 years
Gain importance at the last back-test origin. It measures what the model relies on for prediction, not a causal effect. The strongest single inputs outside conflict history at ten years are population, chokepoint proximity, elevation, ruggedness and population growth.

Theory

Cell-year tests 1995–2023

Foreign capital goes with violence; resource value alone does not

Each row is one test of the materialist account on the grid, with cell and country-year fixed effects and errors clustered by country. A dot to the right of the band supports the hypothesis at 5%; to the left contradicts it.

Two tests hold: cells near assets owned from more foreign countries see more violence, and foreign-owned assets go with violence where no rival powers arm the state. Oil, metal prices, chokepoints, Chinese state finance and foreign troops at resource sites show nothing at this resolution. The exclusion row is a falsification test, where the theory predicts no effect.
Great powers, country level 1946–2025
HypothesisResult

Regions

2026–2035

Nine regions where material stakes and war overlap

The regions with annotated maps in the project, ranked by people facing sustained violence in the decade.

RegionCells ≥ 50%Quiet, 20%+People, sustainedMost affected

Confidence

What the numbers can carry

What holds, and what doesn’t

ClaimHolds
Forecast beats persistence at 1, 5 and 10 yearsyes
Quiet cells ranked ~4× better than chanceyes
Theory layers improve the forecastbarely
Foreign capital nearby → violenceyes, p 0.03
Resource value → violenceno
Great powers avoid direct waryes
LimitEffect
Ownership is a snapshot from about 2020kept out of forecasts
Asset data dense in Africa onlycapital tests weaker elsewhere
UCDP misses militias coded under governmentsWagner invisible
20-year horizon untestabledata start 1989
27 grid tests without correction for multiple testing; at 5% about one would pass by chance, two did. Read the capital results as leads to test further, not as established effects.
Data and method

Outcome. UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset 26.1 and Candidate events to September 2026: events of state-based, non-state and one-sided violence, each placed in a 0.5° PRIO-GRID cell. UCDP only records conflicts that pass a threshold of lethality, so violence that never turns lethal stays invisible here.

Inputs. Conflict history of the cell, its neighbours, a 300 km box and its country; GHS-POP population since 1975; WorldClim elevation and ruggedness; satellite-mapped mining area (Maus et al. 2022); PRIO PETRODATA oil and gas fields; IMF PortWatch chokepoint traffic; World Bank commodity prices; GeoEPR ethnic exclusion; SIPRI arms transfers and UN voting distance for rival suppliers; AidData Chinese official finance; UCDP sides for foreign troops. Foreign ownership of about 6,900 mines, fields and plants from Jasansky et al. 2023 and USGS compilations.

Forecasts. Boosted trees (LightGBM) over four levels of how sustained violence is in the window: none, sporadic (under 10% of months), recurrent (10–50%), sustained (over half). No death counts enter the outcome or the reporting. Uninhabited cells that never saw violence are left out and forecast as none.

Limits. The forecast describes where violence is likely given the past, not where it should be prevented first, and not who will fight. Country borders are today’s.